The difference between full tort and limited tort comes down to your right to sue for pain and suffering after a car accident. This choice affects every Pennsylvania driver, yet many people don’t understand what they’re signing up for when they pick their insurance.
Quick Answer:
Full Tort = You can sue for pain, suffering, and emotional distress after any accident
Limited Tort = You can only sue for pain and suffering if you meet specific “serious injury” exceptions
Cost Difference = Limited tort on average saves $100-$200 per year in premiums
Risk = Limited tort may cost you thousands in compensation you can’t recover
Pennsylvania is one of only three states where you get to choose between these options. The decision you make when buying insurance could mean the difference between full compensation and being uncompensated for the entirety of the damages you suffered after someone else’s mistake.
As one insurance attorney put it: “Choosing limited tort saves you very little money in annual premiums, as little as $100 to $200, yet it may cost you thousands of dollars by not allowing you to recover for certain injuries.”
Many people pick limited tort to save money without realizing they’re giving up important legal rights. Others pay extra for full tort but don’t understand what they’re actually buying.
What Is Tort Car Insurance?
Think of “tort” as a fancy legal word for when someone does something wrong and hurts another person. In car insurance terms, tort means the person who caused the accident has to pay for the damage they created. It’s really that simple.
When someone rear-ends you at a red light, that’s a tort. When a driver runs a stop sign and hits your car, that’s a tort too. The difference between full tort and limited tort comes down to how much compensation you can ask for after these accidents happen.
Pennsylvania operates under what we call a tort system, which means the at-fault driver’s insurance should cover your losses. But here’s where it gets interesting – Pennsylvania also gives you choices about how much you can recover. Understanding Pennsylvania’s auto insurance system helps you make sense of these options.
Most states work this way. If someone hits you, their insurance pays. But Pennsylvania is one of only three states that makes you choose what you may be entitled to recover in a future accident.
How Tort Insurance Differs from No-Fault
Here’s where things get a bit more complicated, but stick with us – it’s worth understanding.
In a tort state, the person who caused the accident pays for your damages through their insurance. If someone hits you, their insurance covers your medical bills, lost wages, car repairs, and potentially your pain and suffering.
In a no-fault state, your own insurance pays your medical bills and lost wages, regardless of who caused the crash. This happens through something called Personal Injury Protection (PIP) coverage. The idea sounds nice – faster payments, fewer arguments about who’s at fault. But there’s a catch: you usually can’t sue the other driver for pain and suffering unless your injuries are really serious.
Pennsylvania’s system is a hybrid, being a no-fault state when it comes to the initial payment of medical bills and/or lost wages but also a tort state making the named insured choose what damages the other driver is responsible for paying.
This choice is exactly where the difference between full tort and limited tort becomes so important. It’s not just about insurance jargon – it’s about real money in your pocket if you’re ever in an accident.
What Are Economic vs. Non-Economic Damages?
When you’re hurt in an accident, your losses fall into two buckets. Understanding these categories helps explain why tort choices matter so much.
Economic damages are the easy ones to calculate because they come with receipts. Your medical bills from the emergency room, doctor visits, and physical therapy all count. So do your lost wages when you can’t work because of your injuries. Property damage to your car fits here too, along with any future medical expenses or lost earning capacity.
These damages are black and white. You either have the bills or you don’t.
Non-economic damages are trickier because they don’t come with price tags. How do you put a dollar amount on pain and suffering? What’s it worth when you can’t sleep through the night because of back pain, or when you’re too anxious to drive on highways anymore?
Loss of enjoyment of life is real too. Maybe you can’t play tennis anymore, or you’re too injured to pick up your grandchildren. Emotional distress from the trauma of the accident can last for months or years.
Here’s the thing about non-economic damages – they’re often worth more than the economic ones. A few thousand dollars in medical bills might come with tens of thousands of dollars in pain and suffering. But with limited tort, you might not be able to recover those non-economic damages unless your injury is considered “serious” under Pennsylvania law.
That’s why the difference between full tort and limited tort matters so much. It’s the difference between getting fully compensated for your losses and potentially leaving money on the table.
What is the Core Difference Between Full Tort and Limited Tort?
Here’s where things get really important for your wallet and your peace of mind. The fundamental difference between full tort and limited tort comes down to one crucial question: what happens to your right to seek compensation for pain and suffering after someone else causes an accident?
When you’re shopping for car insurance in Pennsylvania, you’ll face this choice that could impact your family for years to come. It’s a decision that balances your monthly budget against your potential future needs, and frankly, it’s one that many people make without fully understanding what they’re giving up or gaining.
Think of this choice like choosing between two different levels of protection. You’re essentially deciding whether to pay a bit more now to keep all your legal rights intact, or save some money upfront by agreeing to limit what you can recover if you’re hurt in an accident that wasn’t your fault.
Full Tort: Your Unrestricted Right to Sue
When you choose full tort, you’re keeping all your legal rights on the table. It’s like having a complete insurance safety net that doesn’t have any holes in it.
With full tort coverage, if someone else causes an accident that injures you, you can pursue compensation for every aspect of how that accident affected your life. This means you can seek money for your medical bills and lost wages, but you can also pursue compensation for your physical pain, emotional distress, and how the injury disrupted your daily activities and relationships.
Let’s say you’re rear-ended at a red light and suffer a herniated disc. With full tort, you can not only recover your medical expenses and the wages you lost while recovering, but you can also seek compensation for the months of chronic pain that kept you from playing with your kids or sleeping through the night.
The advantages of full tort are straightforward: you get comprehensive protection that covers both the financial and personal impacts of your injury. You also have stronger negotiating power with insurance companies because they know you can take them to court for the full value of your claim, including pain and suffering. This often leads to fairer settlement offers.
Yes, full tort costs more in premiums. But when we’re talking about protecting your family’s financial future and your right to fair compensation, many people find that extra cost worthwhile.
Limited Tort: Trading Rights for Lower Premiums
Limited tort is the budget-friendly option that comes with a significant catch. When you choose limited tort, you’re essentially signing away your right to sue for pain and suffering damages unless your injuries meet very specific legal thresholds.
With limited tort, you can still recover economic damages like medical bills, lost income, and property damage. But here’s what you give up: compensation for the physical pain you endured, the emotional trauma of the accident, the sleepless nights, the activities you can no longer enjoy, and the strain on your relationships.
Going back to that rear-ended scenario, with limited tort you could recover your medical expenses and lost wages, but you typically couldn’t seek compensation for the months of pain and the impact on your quality of life – unless your injury meets Pennsylvania’s “serious injury” definition.
The trade-off is real: you save money on your premiums, but you potentially give up thousands of dollars in compensation if you’re injured. It’s a gamble that your injuries will either be minor or severe enough to meet the exceptions that allow you to sue for pain and suffering.
Comparing Full Tort vs. Limited Tort
The difference between full tort and limited tort really comes down to whether you want to pay a little more now to keep all your options open, or save money upfront while accepting that you might not be fully compensated if you’re hurt in an accident that wasn’t your fault.
Skip to content 
Think of this choice like choosing between two different levels of protection. You’re essentially deciding whether to pay a bit more now to keep all your legal rights intact, or save some money upfront by agreeing to limit what you can recover if you’re hurt in an accident that wasn’t your fault.